Some notes I took at a Preaching seminar a while back...
Preaching to the Heart – Tim Keller Oak Hill College, 19/11/08
Tolkien noted that a good sermon involves:
ART / VIRTUE / KNOWLEDGE
Col 1:28-29
Admonishing – preaching into lives & situations (SITUATIONAL)
Labouring – aspect of personal experience and involvement (VIRTUE)
Teaching – need knowledge / information / objective truth (NORMATIVE)
When you preach – people are assessing you personally
Evangelicals don’t like that – tend to belittle the Situational & Virtue aspects
i.e. it should just be about the truth I speak – but the reality is you can’t separate the message from yourself or your listeners
U.S. preaching – often excessively situational
Big emphasis on performance / moving people emotionally / being anecdotal
Big weakness is that it lacks knowledge
Our weakness, on the other hand, is often we lack situational invlovement
NEW PREACHERS
Main complaint – good exegesis but lacking in application
The sermons are boney & lack flesh – their word hasn’t become flesh
Can be due to lack of personal / pastoral experience
Jonathan Edwards: purpose of sermon not just to make truth clear but to make it real
Purpose in preaching is to change people even as they listen
APPLICATION
Shouldn’t be tacked on the end of our preparation
But should be in our minds at the beginning of our preparation
Dt 29:29 - Revealed things are there to be obeyed / put into practise / followed
Therefore – there is no part of God’s revelation that is not practical
Everything in the Bible is application
Thus: if you don’t know how a text is to be applied then you haven’t understood it!
Application & Meaning are not different.
Word / Act theory
i.e. Knowing the definition of a word is not the same as understanding the intention behind its use
e.g. Can study a Psalm and breakdown language / understand context – but then need to ask what is the Psalm designed to do?
First part of sermon – says what you need to do
Second part – says this is how to do it (i.e. go to Jesus)
Thursday, 18 November 2010
Wednesday, 10 November 2010
NOTES ON PREACHING SLOTS
Some guidance for those who will be giving talks on Stream nights...
1. KEEP TO TIME - your talk should be no more than 12mins (if you get to 15 we will have to interrupt and ask you to stop).
2. DON'T 'PERFORM' - we're not looking a 'performance', our concern is how you handle the passage not that you ooze 'Barak Obama-esque' oratorical skills. So relax and be yourself.
3. EXHAUSTIVE CAN BE EXHAUSTING: it's a 10-12min talk! - not a comprehensive analysis of everything that could be said (we understand that). So focus on the main point in what you say.
WHAT WE ARE LOOKING FOR...
1. Did the speaker get the main point of the passage? Did they make that the main point of their talk?
2. Could I as a listener follow what they were saying - did it make sense?
3. What it obvious that what they were saying was from their passage?
4. Were their illustrations (if any) helpful or confusing in understanding the passage.
5. Did they appropriately communicate the tone of the passage (e.g. were they chiding when the author's tone was conciliatory, or vice-versa)?
6. Did they apply it - i.e. did they give an example of the relevance of the passage for me today?
REMEMBER - we're all in this together & there is no such thing as the 'perfect sermon' - this is simply a chance for us to learn and encourage each other in this important ministry.
1. KEEP TO TIME - your talk should be no more than 12mins (if you get to 15 we will have to interrupt and ask you to stop).
2. DON'T 'PERFORM' - we're not looking a 'performance', our concern is how you handle the passage not that you ooze 'Barak Obama-esque' oratorical skills. So relax and be yourself.
3. EXHAUSTIVE CAN BE EXHAUSTING: it's a 10-12min talk! - not a comprehensive analysis of everything that could be said (we understand that). So focus on the main point in what you say.
WHAT WE ARE LOOKING FOR...
1. Did the speaker get the main point of the passage? Did they make that the main point of their talk?
2. Could I as a listener follow what they were saying - did it make sense?
3. What it obvious that what they were saying was from their passage?
4. Were their illustrations (if any) helpful or confusing in understanding the passage.
5. Did they appropriately communicate the tone of the passage (e.g. were they chiding when the author's tone was conciliatory, or vice-versa)?
6. Did they apply it - i.e. did they give an example of the relevance of the passage for me today?
REMEMBER - we're all in this together & there is no such thing as the 'perfect sermon' - this is simply a chance for us to learn and encourage each other in this important ministry.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)